Skip to content

Runway Gen-4 Turbo vs Veo 3.1 Fast

Runway's Runway Gen-4 Turbo and Google's Veo 3.1 Fast both target video generation, but they price and behave differently. Here is the side-by-side.

Pricing checked against provider documentation on . How we verify

The short answer

Runway Gen-4 Turbo is the cheaper option — roughly 3.0x less on a blended workload, and it suits fast iteration inside an editing suite. Veo 3.1 Fast justifies its premium when you need veo quality at a working budget.

Runway Gen-4 Turbo

Runway • Runway Gen-4

stable

$0.05 / $

/ video sec (input / output)

Generates a ten-second clip in roughly thirty seconds, about five times faster than the standard Gen-4, and the Gen-4 family is specifically tuned for keeping characters and locations consistent across shots. No native audio on this family — budget for a separate audio pass.

Veo 3.1 Fast

Google • Veo 3.1

stable

$0.15 / $

/ video sec (input / output)

The practical default in the Veo line: native audio included, video extension and reference-image support intact, at roughly a third of the standard model's price. Supports text-to-video, image-to-video, and generation from first and last frames, with C2PA content credentials attached to output.

Input price

Veo 3.1 Fast is 3.0x the price than Runway Gen-4 Turbo on input tokens.

Specification comparison

Attribute Runway Gen-4 Turbo Veo 3.1 Fast
Input (/ video sec) $0.05 $0.15
Output (/ video sec)
Cached input
Context window
Max output
Native reasoning No No
Knowledge cutoff
Relative latency low medium
Open weights No No
API model ID gen4_turbo veo-3.1-fast-generate-001
Status stable stable

Runway Gen-4 Turbo: Billed as 5 credits per second at $0.01 per credit. No native audio on the Gen-4 family.

Veo 3.1 Fast: Audio included. Video-only routes are cheaper at roughly $0.08–$0.10/sec, and third-party resellers vary. Clips are 4, 6, or 8 seconds.

Choose Runway Gen-4 Turbo if…

  • Consistent characters across scenes
  • Fast creative iteration
  • Editor-grade production workflows
  • Image-to-video animation
Full Runway Gen-4 Turbo details →

Choose Veo 3.1 Fast if…

  • Social and marketing clips with audio
  • Image-to-video animation
  • Extending existing footage
  • Volume production on a budget
Full Veo 3.1 Fast details →

Frequently asked

Is Runway Gen-4 Turbo or Veo 3.1 Fast cheaper?

Runway Gen-4 Turbo is cheaper. On a blended 3:1 input-to-output workload it costs about 3.0x less than Veo 3.1 Fast.

Which has the larger context window, Runway Gen-4 Turbo or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Both accept up to — tokens, so context is not a differentiator here.

Should I use Runway Gen-4 Turbo or Veo 3.1 Fast?

Pick Runway Gen-4 Turbo for fast iteration inside an editing suite. Pick Veo 3.1 Fast for veo quality at a working budget. If cost dominates the decision, Runway Gen-4 Turbo wins; if you need the capability ceiling, benchmark both on your own evals before committing.

← All comparisons